Due to historical reasons (not available before 9.6) we used `pg_current_wal_lsn()`/`pg_current_xlog_location()` functions to get current WAL LSN on the primary. But, this LSN is not necessarily synced to disk, and could be lost if the primary node crashed.
It seems that a common pitfall for new users of Patroni is that the `bootstrap.dcs` section is only used to initialize the configuration in DCS. This moves the comment about this to an info block so it is more visible to the reader.
New patroni.py option that allows to
* generate patroni.yml configuration file with the values from a running cluster
* generate a sample patroni.yml configuration file
* Refactor is_failover_possible()
Move all the members filtering inside the function.
* Remove check_synchronous parameter
* Add sync_mode_is_active() method and user it everywhere where it is appropriate
* Reduce nesting
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Kukushkin <[email protected]>
consider the scenario(enable failsafe_mode):
0. node1(primary) - node2(replica)
1. stop all etcd nodes; wait ttl seconds; start all etcd nodes; (node2's failsafe will contain the info about node1)
2. switchover to node2; (node2's failsafe still contain the info about node1)
3. stop all etcd nodes; wait ttl seconds; start all etcd nodes;
4. node2 will demote because it consider node1 as primary
Resetting failsafe state when running as a primary fixes the issue.
1. Unit tests should not really try accessing any resources.
2. Not doing so results in significant execution time of unit tests on Windows
In addition to that perform a request with timeout 3s. Usually this is more than enough to figure out whether resource is accessible.
Followup on #2724
This PR is an attempt of refactoring the docs about migration to Patroni.
These are a few enhancements that we propose through this PR:
* Docs used to mention the procedure can only be performed in a single-node cluster. We changed that so the procedure considers a cluster composed of primary and standbys;
* Teach how to deal with pre-existing replication slots;
* Explain how to create the user for `pg_rewind`, if user intends to enable `use_pg_rewind`.
References: PAT-143.
Postgres supports two types of permissions:
1. owner only
2. group readable
By default the first one is used because it provides better security. But, sometimes people want to run a backup tool with the user that is different from postgres. In this case the second option becomes very useful. Unfortunately it didn't work correctly because Patroni was creating files with owner access only permissions.
This PR changes the behavior and permissions on files and directories that are created by Patroni will be calculated based on permissions of PGDATA. I.e., they will get group readable access when it is necessary.
Close#1899Close#1901
The docs of `slots` configuration used to have this mention:
```
my_slot_name: the name of replication slot. If the permanent slot name
matches with the name of the current primary it will not be created.
Everything else is the responsibility of the operator to make sure that
there are no clashes in names between replication slots automatically
created by Patroni for members and permanent replication slots.
```
However that is not true in the sense that Patroni does not check for
clashes between `my_slot_name` and the name of replication slots created
for replicating changes among members. If you specify a slot name that
clashes with the name of a replication slot used by a member, it turns
out Patroni will make the slot permanent in the primary even if the member
key expire from the DCS.
Through this commit we also enhance the docs in terms of explaining that
physical permanent slots are maintained only in the primary, while logical
replication slots are copied from primary to standbys.
Signed-off-by: Israel Barth Rubio <[email protected]>
The node `postgresql2` in the repository is apparently supposed
to be a cascading standby.
However, if that is the case, there is a typo in the name of its
upstream node.
This commit fixes that issue.
In issue #2735 it was discussed that there should be some warning around PostgreSQL parameters that do not pass validation.
This commit ensures something is logged for parameters that fail validation and therefore fall back to default values.
Close#2735Close#2740
Consider a following situation:
1. node1 is stressed so much that Patroni heart-beat can't run regularly and the leader lock expires.
2. node2 notice that there is no leader, gets the lock, promotes, and gets to a situation like it is described in 1.
3. Patroni on node1 finally wakes up, notice that Postgres is running as a primary, but without a leader lock and "happily" acquires the lock.
That is, node1 discarded promoting of node2, and the node2 after that it will not be possible to join the node2 back to the cluster, because pg_rewind is not possible when two nodes are on the same timeline.
To partially mitigate the problem we introduce an additional timeline check. If postgres is running as primary Patroni will consider it as a perfect candidate only if timeline isn't behind the last known cluster timeline recorder in the `/history` key. If postgres timeline is behind the cluster timeline postgres will be demoted to read-only. Further behavior would depend on `maximum_lag_on_failover` and `check_timeline` settings.
Since the `/history` key isn't updated instantly after promotion, there is still a short period of time when the issue could happen, but it seems that it is close to impossible to make it more reliable.
Close https://github.com/zalando/patroni/issues/2779
It was reported in #2779 that the primary was constantly logging messages like `Synchronous replication key updated by someone else`.
It happened after Patroni was stuck due to resource starvation. Key updates are performed using create_revision/mod_revision field, which value is taken from the internal cached. Hence, it is a clear symptom of stale cache.
Similar issues in K8s implementation were addressed by invalidating the cache and restarting watcher connections every time when update failed due to resource_version mismatch, so we do the same for Etcd3.
On Slack user reported that Patroni didn't run pg_rewind on one of the nodes after coming out of maintenance mode.
Steps that were executed:
0. The initial state: node1 - primary, node2 - replica
1. `patronictl pause`
2. On node2: pg_ctl promote
3. On node1: pg_ctl stop
4. Patroni on node1 notice that Postgres isn't running and removes the leader lock
5. Patroni on node2 notice that Postgres is running as a primary and takes the leader lock.
6. `patronictl resume`.
After that node1 started saying in logs:
`Waiting for checkpoint on node2 before rewind`.
Repeating this steps may not necessarily reproduce the problem, because presumably pg_rewind failed earlier on node1.
Such situation was possible because promote wasn't executed by Patroni and therefore `Rewind._state` wasn't explicitly reset and the code that ensures that CHECKPOINT after promote was run wasn't triggered.
As a mitigation following changes have been made:
1. retrigger pg_rewind checks after coming out of maintenance mode
2. run ensure CHECKPOINT after promote checks using `Rewind._state != REWIND_STATUS.CHECKPOINT` condition. It allowed to remove useless hook from `Postgresql.promote()`.
When we don't have permanent logical slots Patroni was updating the `/status` on every heart-beat loop even when LSN on the primary isn't moving forward.
The issue was introduced in the #2485
1. Take client certificates only from the `ctl` section. Motivation: sometimes there are server-only certificates that can't be used as client certificates. As a result neither Patroni not patronictl work correctly even if `--insecure` option is used.
2. Document that if `restapi.verify_client` is set to `required` then client certificates **must** be provided in the `ctl` section.
3. Add support for `ctl.authentication` and prefer to use it over `restapi.authentication`.
4. Silence annoying InsecureRequestWarning when `patronictl -k` is used, so that behavior becomes is similar to `curl -k`.
Alexander Kukushkin