optimclaw/src/tools

Tool System

Adding a New Tool

Built-in Tools (Rust)

1. Create src/tools/builtin/my_tool.rs
2. Implement the Tool trait
3. Add mod my_tool; and pub use in src/tools/builtin/mod.rs
4. Register in ToolRegistry::register_builtin_tools() in registry.rs
5. Add tests

WASM Tools (Recommended)

WASM tools are the preferred way to add new capabilities. They run in a sandboxed environment with explicit capabilities.

1. Create a new crate in tools-src/<name>/
2. Implement the WIT interface (wit/tool.wit)
3. Create <name>.capabilities.json declaring required permissions
4. Build with cargo build --target wasm32-wasip2 --release
5. Install with ironclaw tool install path/to/tool.wasm

See tools-src/ for examples.

Tool Architecture Principles

CRITICAL: Keep tool-specific logic out of the main agent codebase.

The main agent provides generic infrastructure; tools are self-contained units that declare their requirements through capabilities files.

What Goes in Tools (capabilities.json)

• API endpoints the tool needs (HTTP allowlist)
• Credentials required (secret names, injection locations)
• Rate limits and timeouts
• Auth setup instructions (see below)
• Workspace paths the tool can read

What Does NOT Go in Main Agent

• Service-specific auth flows (OAuth for Notion, Slack, etc.)
• Service-specific CLI commands (auth notion, auth slack)
• Service-specific configuration handling
• Hardcoded API URLs or token formats

Tool Authentication

Tools declare their auth requirements in <tool>.capabilities.json under the auth section. Two methods are supported:

OAuth (Browser-based login)

For services that support OAuth, users just click through browser login:

{
  "auth": {
    "secret_name": "notion_api_token",
    "display_name": "Notion",
    "oauth": {
      "authorization_url": "https://api.notion.com/v1/oauth/authorize",
      "token_url": "https://api.notion.com/v1/oauth/token",
      "client_id_env": "NOTION_OAUTH_CLIENT_ID",
      "client_secret_env": "NOTION_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET",
      "scopes": [],
      "use_pkce": false,
      "extra_params": { "owner": "user" }
    },
    "env_var": "NOTION_TOKEN"
  }
}

To enable OAuth for a tool:

1. Register a public OAuth app with the service (e.g., notion.so/my-integrations)
2. Configure redirect URIs: http://localhost:9876/callback through http://localhost:9886/callback
3. Set environment variables for client_id and client_secret

Manual Token Entry (Fallback)

For services without OAuth or when OAuth isn't configured:

{
  "auth": {
    "secret_name": "openai_api_key",
    "display_name": "OpenAI",
    "instructions": "Get your API key from platform.openai.com/api-keys",
    "setup_url": "https://platform.openai.com/api-keys",
    "token_hint": "Starts with 'sk-'",
    "env_var": "OPENAI_API_KEY"
  }
}

Auth Flow Priority

When running ironclaw tool auth <tool>:

1. Check env_var - if set in environment, use it directly
2. Check oauth - if configured, open browser for OAuth flow
3. Fall back to instructions + manual token entry

The agent reads auth config from the tool's capabilities file and provides the appropriate flow. No service-specific code in the main agent.

WASM Tools vs MCP Servers: When to Use Which

Both are first-class in the extension system (ironclaw tool install handles both), but they have different strengths.

WASM Tools (IronClaw native)

• Sandboxed: fuel metering, memory limits, no access except what's allowlisted
• Credentials injected by host runtime, tool code never sees the actual token
• Output scanned for secret leakage before returning to the LLM
• Auth (OAuth/manual) declared in capabilities.json, agent handles the flow
• Single binary, no process management, works offline
• Cost: must build yourself in Rust, no ecosystem, synchronous only

MCP Servers (Model Context Protocol)

• Growing ecosystem of pre-built servers (GitHub, Notion, Postgres, etc.)
• Any language (TypeScript/Python most common)
• Can do websockets, streaming, background polling
• Cost: external process with full system access (no sandbox), manages own credentials, IronClaw can't prevent leaks

Decision guide:

Scenario	Use
Good MCP server already exists	MCP
Handles sensitive credentials (email send, banking)	WASM
Quick prototype or one-off integration	MCP
Core capability you'll maintain long-term	WASM
Needs background connections (websockets, polling)	MCP
Multiple tools share one OAuth token (e.g., Google suite)	WASM

The LLM-facing interface is identical for both (tool name, schema, execute), so swapping between them is transparent to the agent.