Files
Henry ParkandGitHub 82822d7b25 fix: restore owner-scoped gateway startup (#1625)
* fix: restore owner-scoped gateway startup

* fix: split gateway owner and sender scope

* fix: keep multi-user gateway sender identity

* test: cover gateway sender scope regression

* test: harden e2e startup teardown race

* fix: align gateway owner scope across auth modes
2026-03-24 16:11:53 -07:00
..

IronClaw E2E Tests

Browser-level end-to-end tests for the IronClaw web gateway using Python + Playwright.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.11+
  • Rust toolchain (for building ironclaw)
  • Chromium (installed via Playwright)

Setup

cd tests/e2e
pip install -e .
playwright install chromium

Build ironclaw

The tests need the ironclaw binary built with libsql support:

cargo build --no-default-features --features libsql

Run tests

# From repo root
pytest tests/e2e/ -v

# Run a single scenario
pytest tests/e2e/scenarios/test_chat.py -v

# With visible browser (not headless)
HEADED=1 pytest tests/e2e/scenarios/test_connection.py -v

Architecture

Tests start two subprocesses:

  1. Mock LLM (mock_llm.py) -- fake OpenAI-compat server with canned responses
  2. IronClaw -- the real binary with gateway enabled, pointing to the mock LLM

Then Playwright drives a headless Chromium browser against the gateway, making DOM assertions.

Scenarios

File What it tests
test_connection.py Auth, tab navigation, connection status
test_chat.py Send message, SSE streaming, response rendering
test_skills.py ClawHub search, skill install/remove
test_tool_approval.py Tool approval overlay (approve, deny, always, params toggle)
test_sse_reconnect.py SSE reconnection handling
test_html_injection.py HTML injection security
test_extensions.py Extensions tab: install, remove, configure, OAuth, auth card, activate

Adding new scenarios

  1. Create tests/e2e/scenarios/test_<name>.py
  2. Use the page fixture for a fresh browser page
  3. Use selectors from helpers.py (update SEL dict if new elements are needed)
  4. Keep tests deterministic -- use the mock LLM, not real providers

Mocking API responses with page.route()

For tabs that depend on external data (extensions, jobs, memory, routines), use Playwright's page.route() to intercept the browser's HTTP requests to the ironclaw gateway and return deterministic fixture JSON. This avoids needing real installed binaries, live external services, or complex database setup.

Basic pattern

import json

async def test_something(page):
    # 1. Set up route intercepts BEFORE navigation triggers the fetch
    # Always use async def handlers — route.fulfill() is a coroutine and must be awaited.
    async def handle_tools(route):
        await route.fulfill(
            status=200,
            content_type="application/json",
            body=json.dumps({"tools": [{"name": "echo", "description": "Echo"}]}),
        )

    await page.route("**/api/extensions/tools", handle_tools)

    # 2. Navigate / interact to trigger the fetch
    await page.locator('.tab-bar button[data-tab="extensions"]').click()

    # 3. Assert on the rendered DOM
    rows = page.locator("#tools-tbody tr")
    assert await rows.count() == 1

Matching only the exact path

**/api/extensions matches http://host/api/extensions but NOT sub-paths like http://host/api/extensions/install. For the bare list endpoint, add a check inside the handler:

async def handle_ext_list(route):
    path = route.request.url.split("?")[0]
    if path.endswith("/api/extensions"):
        await route.fulfill(json={"extensions": []})
    else:
        await route.continue_()   # Let sub-paths through to the real server

await page.route("**/api/extensions*", handle_ext_list)

Mocking method-specific behaviour (GET vs POST)

async def handle_setup(route):
    if route.request.method == "GET":
        await route.fulfill(json={"secrets": [...]})
    else:  # POST
        await route.fulfill(json={"success": True})

await page.route("**/api/extensions/my-ext/setup", handle_setup)

Counting calls (for reload tests)

calls = []

async def counting_handler(route):
    calls.append(1)
    await route.fulfill(json={"extensions": []})

await page.route("**/api/extensions", counting_handler)
# ... interact ...
assert len(calls) == 2   # called twice (initial + after some action)

Applying the pattern to other tabs

Tab Key API endpoints to mock
Jobs /api/jobs, /api/jobs/{id}, /api/jobs/{id}/events
Memory /api/memory/search, /api/memory/tree, /api/memory/read
Routines /api/routines, /api/routines/{id}/runs

Injecting state directly via page.evaluate()

For purely client-side UI (components rendered entirely in JS without API calls), call the JavaScript function directly to skip the network layer entirely:

# Show an approval card without needing a real tool execution
await page.evaluate("""
    showApproval({
        request_id: 'test-001',
        thread_id: currentThreadId,
        tool_name: 'shell',
        description: 'Run something',
    })
""")

This is the pattern used in most of test_tool_approval.py and parts of test_extensions.py (auth card, configure modal). The waiting-approval regression in test_tool_approval.py uses a real tool call instead so it can exercise backend approval state.