The Claude review step was failing ~40% of the time because:
- --allowedTools didn't include Read, Glob, Grep, Agent, causing 8-9
permission denials per run and preventing Claude from reading files
or spawning the subagents the prompt required
- Step 4 spawned N additional scoring agents per issue found, exhausting
the 50-turn budget before the PR comment could be posted
- Subagents could independently post PR comments, causing fragmented output
Fix: add missing tools to --allowedTools, merge per-issue scoring into
the review agents themselves, and add guardrails ensuring exactly one
consolidated comment is always posted.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
Cherry-pick of #802: run fmt + clippy on staging PRs, skip Windows clippy,
simplify claude-review trigger to labeled-only.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
Cherry-pick of #794: remove continue-on-error hack, skip redundant checks
on staging PRs, allow ironclaw-ci[bot] in Claude Code review.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
* feat(ci): chained promotion PRs with multi-agent Claude review [skip-regression-check]
Staging CI workflow with batched promotion PRs:
- Creates staging-promote/<sha> branches per batch
- Chains PRs onto previous promotion branch (incremental diffs)
- Claude Code reviews only the incremental changes per batch
- Blocked PRs stay open as records of findings
- staging-tested tag advances regardless of gate outcome
- Runs every 60 min on cron + manual dispatch
Multi-agent Claude review (Sonnet orchestrator + Haiku agents):
- 4 parallel Sonnet review agents (security, architecture, bugs, performance)
- Haiku agents for severity/confidence scoring
- [SEVERITY:CONFIDENCE] output format
- Severity/confidence matrix for issue creation and gate blocking:
CRITICAL: always create issue, block if confidence >=80
HIGH: create issue if confidence >=50
MEDIUM/LOW: create issue if confidence >=80
OutBack Dingo