Add a missing EHT related field to fix the following ethtool warning:
[98179.287352] mt7921e 0003:01:00.0: ei: 74 SSTATS_LEN: 73
Fixes: c74df1c067f2 ("wifi: mt76: mt792x: introduce mt792x-lib module")
Signed-off-by: Gen Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Move the following shared usb routines in mt792x module:
- mt792xu_stop
- mt792x_stop
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Move struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf up to struct mt76_vif to allow the
connac2 library can access the struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf * member in
struct mt76_vif.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Ruth <[email protected]>
Tested-by: David Ruth <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
When compiling with clang 16.0.6 and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've
noticed the following (somewhat confusing due to absence of an actual
source code location):
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt792x_core.c:4:
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:13:
In file included from ./include/linux/stat.h:19:
In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:60:
In file included from ./include/linux/time32.h:13:
In file included from ./include/linux/timex.h:67:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:23:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:4: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with 'warning' attribute: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
__read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c:4:
In file included from ./include/linux/etherdevice.h:20:
In file included from ./include/linux/if_ether.h:19:
In file included from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:15:
In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:60:
In file included from ./include/linux/time32.h:13:
In file included from ./include/linux/timex.h:67:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/timex.h:5:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:23:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:4: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with 'warning' attribute: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
__read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c:6:
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/mt7996.h:9:
In file included from ./include/linux/interrupt.h:8:
In file included from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12:
In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:11:
In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:254:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:592:4: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with 'warning' attribute: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
__read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
The compiler actually complains on 'mt7915_get_et_strings()',
'mt792x_get_et_strings()' and 'mt7996_get_et_strings()' due to the same
reason: fortification logic inteprets call to 'memcpy()' as an attempt
to copy the whole array from its first member and so issues an overread
warning. These warnings may be silenced by passing an address of the whole
array and not the first member to 'memcpy()'.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
mt7921_load_firmware routine is shared between mt7921 and mt7925 chipset
so move it in mt792x-lib module.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Move the following runtime-pm pci routines in mt792x-lib since they are
shared between mt7921 and mt7925 chipsets:
- __mt7921e_mcu_drv_pmctrl
- mt7921e_mcu_drv_pmctrl
- mt7921e_mcu_fw_pmctrl
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Moving hif_ops marcos in mt792x.h, we can move shared runtime-pm code
between mt7925 and mt7921 in mt792x-lib module.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Rely on irq_map support, move more dma shared code between mt7921 and
mt7925 in mt792x_dma.c
Move the following dma code in mt792x-lib
- mt792x_dma_enable
- mt792x_dma_reset
- mt792x_wpdma_reset
- mt792x_wpdma_reinit_cond
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
mt792x-lib module will contain the shared code between mt7921 and new
MT79 WiFi7 chipset
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
