mirror of
https://github.com/outbackdingo/mt76.git
synced 2026-10-24 13:26:48 +00:00
wifi: mt76: add missing lock protection in mt76_sta_state for sta_event callback
mt76_sta_state() calls the sta_event callback without holding dev->mutex. However, mt7915_mac_sta_event() (MT7915 implementation of this callback) calls mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow() which has lockdep_assert_held(&dev->mt76.mutex) indicating that callers must hold this lock. The locking pattern in mt76_sta_state() is inconsistent: - mt76_sta_add() acquires dev->mutex before calling dev->drv->sta_add - mt76_sta_remove() acquires dev->mutex before calling __mt76_sta_remove - But sta_event callback is called without acquiring the lock Add mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() around the mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow invocation to fix the missing lock protection and maintain consistency with the existing locking pattern. Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -859,8 +859,10 @@ int mt7915_mac_sta_event(struct mt76_dev *mdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
|
|||||||
return mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_PORT_SECURE, false);
|
return mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_PORT_SECURE, false);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case MT76_STA_EVENT_DISASSOC:
|
case MT76_STA_EVENT_DISASSOC:
|
||||||
|
mutex_lock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msta->twt.flow); i++)
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msta->twt.flow); i++)
|
||||||
mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow(dev, msta, i);
|
mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow(dev, msta, i);
|
||||||
|
mutex_unlock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_DISCONNECT, false);
|
mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_DISCONNECT, false);
|
||||||
msta->wcid.sta_disabled = 1;
|
msta->wcid.sta_disabled = 1;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user